Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Bruce Miller wrote:
> I personally think the most compelling case for annotations, especially 
> in a web context, is to provide presentation MathML for display to 
> humans, along with the corresponding content MathML (when available) for 
> export to applications (or perhaps for audio rendering, or ...).

I agree, but that isn't a problem we're trying to solve for HTML5:

Nobody includes the equivalent of content MathML when writing their papers 
using LaTeX. Why would they do so with HTML?

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Sunday, 30 March 2008 04:03:28 UTC