Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML

On Mar 30, 2008, at 01:11, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Since SVG in MathML works fine in the #1 SVG-in-MathML browser  
> engine implementation (Gecko in Firefox 3), I think requiring the  
> <semantics><annotation-xml encoding="SVG1.1"> cruft around <svg> is  
> just silly and it would be better to make <svg> subtrees conforming  
> directly inside Presentation MathML.

I meant to say that SVG in MathML works fine in Gecko without the  
<semantics><annotation-xml encoding="SVG1.1"> wrapper (so the wrapper  
is pointless).

Henri Sivonen

Received on Saturday, 29 March 2008 23:18:29 UTC