Re: [whatwg] Exploring new vocabularies for HTML

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Doug Schepers wrote:
> You talk about including graphics and diagrams in a very generic way, 
> without specifically mentioning vector graphics in general, or SVG in 
> particular.  I believe most people on this thread have assumed that you 
> are talking about SVG.  However, it's not clear from your public 
> statements that that's your intent.

I haven't looked in detail at the vector graphics side of the problem yet. 
Off-hand it looks like SVG would be a reasonably good fit for some of the 
requirements, in particular ease of implementation and a reasonably 
well-defined scripting environment, but it also isn't a perfect fit for 
everything, for example it probably isn't supported in as wide a 
collection of editors as, say, the Windows Metafile format, and isn't 
supported in as wide an installed base of browsers as, say, VML. I do not 
wish to prematurely limit our options, doing so would not be fair to the 
Web authoring community.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Saturday, 29 March 2008 19:49:38 UTC