Erik Dahlström wrote on 03/19/2008 05:08:25 AM: > > I think it's not up to the HTML spec to specify what happens if the error > occurs in the SVG itself, for example what happens if there are unknown > elements in unexpected locations in the svg, or how invalid attribute > values should be treated. > > What's in scope for the html spec IMHO is to define how to produce the svg > DOM tree when found inline in an html document. Possibly also to define > what should be shown in case the SVG DOM tree is broken somehow, and to > define how svg fragments may interact with each other and with surrounding > HTML in the cases where that hasn't been defined in SVG. +1 > I agree that nothing should prevent you from using correct SVG fragments > inline in html. Agree in principle, but "nothing" is too strong. Requiring HTML to support "<!ENTITY>" may not be necessary or appropriate. Example: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/91/Adobe_Creative_Suite_2_logo.svg - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2008 12:07:41 UTC