- From: liorean <liorean@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 07:03:55 +0100
- To: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 01/03/2008, Nicholas C. Zakas <html@nczonline.net> wrote: > From this description, it seems like the <section/> element has little use. > If you're talking about writing articles, most authors consider the start > and end of sections as implicitly defined by headings. Making this explicit > seems unnecessary so long as headings are still available and used. It's > just extra syntax to represent something that is more easily represented > without it. Sections allow some things that are impossible with the outline hierarchy of HTML4. In HTML4, once you had a header you needed a header of the same level or higher to make a paragraph not belong to that header. With sections you can make paragraphs belong to headers above the immediately preceeding one. You can have paragraphs that do not belong where they would in the HTML4 outline hierarchy. For example you can have a third level header as direct child of a first level header in the outline, even if there is a second level header before it. Sections allow stopping the association between a header and all that comes after it at some point. HTML4 outline hierarchy couldn't do this. Section is as I recall an idea imported from XHTML2. From what I understood, sections were originally meant to relate to sections of the information content as differentiated from divisions of the document structure. -- David "liorean" Andersson
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2008 06:04:03 UTC