- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:29:03 +0200
- To: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
- CC: 'Mark Baker' <distobj@acm.org>, "'Michael(tm) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Justin James wrote: >>> Somebody suggested "HTML URL" on uri@w3.org - I think that's a better >>> option because its makes the distinction more apparent. > >> So far that's the best candidate I have heard of. > > Most people can't tell the difference between a URI and a URL and use the > terms interchangeably. Heck, I can barely discern the distinction most of > the time. Do we really want to make things even more confusing? You mean, more confusing than calling things a URL which are not URLs, let alone URIs? BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 18:36:26 UTC