- From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:53:30 +0900
- To: Ben 'Cerbera' Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 15:54:07 UTC
Hi Ben, > @2008-06-27 16:35 +0100: > I thought only those messages which are useful for the person handling a > particular issue or action should be associated with it? Figuring out > what's useful to those people is what has me stumped. I guess if you think it provides any information about a particular issue that nobody else has provided so far, it's worthwhile to do the issue-NNN thing to get it into the Tracker DB record for that issue. > For example, should I have associated my previous message "Re: @headers > on th too or just td?" with any actions or issues? Issue 20 is the issue we've been using to track the @headers issue, so if you figure your message provided any new information that would help with the discussion around @headers, issue 20 would be the one to have associated it with. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 15:54:07 UTC