- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:57:55 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5757 Summary: MediaElement features are needed on OBJECT element Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SpatialTemporalAudible OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Spec proposals AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: rob@robburns.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org * The new video and audio elements have many useful features valuable to authors, but authors using the OBJECT element would also want to make use of these MediaELement features * The VIDEO and AUDIO element’s create parsing tree construction problems in legacy UAs whereas the OBJECT element with MediaElement features would not have this problem * Arbitrary handlers may also be able to expose similar interfaces and make use of the DOM methods and attributes and content attributes * Though some feel OBJECT is too overloaded to handle these features, the current VIDEO element has virtually the same implementation as would be necessary for the OBJECT element requires so it would be similarly overloaded * while not necessarily something HTML5 needs to address directly implementations require — for better code maintainability — methods of abstraction and code factoring that are independent from the elements these classes are use with, i.e., - implementations need to implement interfaces such MediaElement in a way that it can be attached to any element regardless of its type name - DOM interfaces should be modularized for reuse by for instance separating MediaElement and VideoElement interfaces into separate classes for 1) networking, 2) audible, 3) spatial, 4) temporal, and 5) UI control interfaces — where these interfaces can be attached to an element and have their methods and attributes flattened for DOM interaction - (this is all to suggest the overloading issue is not a burden that should be lifted off of implementors and placed on authors or by inaequately specifying OBJECT element behavior, but instead handled through good code design) * Authors find it needlessly complicated to author using VIDEO and AUDIO in a way that degrades gracefully in legacy UAs when required to use additional elements that will not parse consistently and in an interoperable way across existing UAs * Authors should be able to embed content using the OBJECT element with minimal markup and expect UAs to provide sane default parameters and presentation, but currently, prevalent browsers are not quite there yet (though close) (see http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SpatialTemporalAudible for evolving solution proposals) [authoring issue, no additional implementation] -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2008 10:58:28 UTC