Re: improved HTML fragment identifiers

Hi Erik,

> @2008-06-12 18:31 -0700:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5744 is the bugzilla URI  
> of the new issue (called "Improved Fragment Identifiers"), and for now  
> it simply contains the text of my initial message to this list  
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008May/0509.html).

Thanks for taking time to add it there and for notifying the list.
I've added a link to the bugzilla issue list on the HTML WG
homepage (http://www.w3.org/html/wg/) and also set up a redirect
to bugzilla here:

  http://www.w3.org/html/wg/bugzilla

> a  number of fields in bugzilla don't make a whole lot sense for
> specification discussions, and i left all of these at their
> default  values; if there are other conventions for handling
> that, please let me  know.

Fine to just leave the default values for those. Most of the
fields (Hardware, OS, Version, Severity, Target Milestone) in the
right-hand column of the Details sections are things that we
really need change or pay attention to.

  --Mike

-- 
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
http://sideshowbarker.net/