- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:56:10 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>, James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > ... > It's only necessary because the HTTP working group refuses to act in a > responsible manner and actually specify how to write an interoperable user > agent that is both compatible with the Web and handles invalid content. If > HTTP defined how to do this, we wouldn't be stuck with defining it > ourselves. > ... It would be interesting to know how many pages actually have that problem; chat on IRC indicates it is below 1/1000. It seems to me you're doing overspecification for edge cases here. BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 29 February 2008 23:56:32 UTC