- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:30:59 -0800
- To: Dmitry Turin <html60@narod.ru>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Dmitry Turin wrote: > Dan, > > DC> "We expect that typically, an editor makes an initial proposal, which is > DC> refined in discussion with Working Group members and other reviewers, > DC> and consensus emerges with little formal decision-making." > DC> -- http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#decisions > > There is link > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies#Votes > on mentioned page (and note: "This charter is written in accordance with > Section 3.4, Votes of the W3C Process Document and includes _no_ voting > procedures beyond what the Process Document requires"). > > 1) Can i put on voting my proposals about new controls > http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/tabfile_eng.htm > http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/cube_eng.htm > http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/quest_eng.htm > ? It only makes sense to call for votes when discussion has shown substantial support, and I haven't seen much support for those, so no, I'm not inclined to call for votes on those proposals. (so far, only the co-chairs have started calls for votes). > 2) I'm invited expert, and i'd like to know, am i "Good Standing" > to participate in voting? Yes; the official list is http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=40318&public=1 and there you are listed in good standing. If you have further process questions, please send them to me an Chris Wilson and Mike Smith, not to the whole WG. A copy to www-archive@w3.org to leave a public record is often a good idea. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:31:09 UTC