- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:20:39 +0100
- To: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- CC: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@royal-tunbridge-wells.org>, Sam Kuper <sam.kuper@uclmail.net>, public-html@w3.org
Jeff Schiller 08-02-21 00.43: > On 2/20/08, Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@royal-tunbridge-wells.org> wrote: > > The decision as to whether to open in the same > > window, the same window but a new tab, or in > > a new window, should be the user's and the user's > > alone. The document can offer guidance (such as > > "best opened in a new window"), but should not > > enforce that behaviour. > > Why? Why should the web app author have no choice? It has already > been illustrated that certain web apps (GMail, Google Reader, banks) > have perfectly valid reasons to open new tabs (for help screens, to > maintain session state, or whatever). Removing that (or making it > difficult) means workarounds (JS) for the author, but most importantly > it offers a potentially painful experience to the user if the authors > do not work around it. > I support the stance that target=_blank has a role to play. Personally I have a dreadful experience with my online bank account. When it shows e.g. the monthly list of transactions (now and then that list has some lenght - besides I can expand it to up to a year's lenght), and if I click on one of the transactions to read its details, then that internet banking system opens the deteail view in the same window. And what does that mean? I means that I loose control on where in the transaction list I was. When I return to the transaction list, I have to use time to find it again. Had instead the detailed view been opened in a new window/tab, I would have been much happier. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2008 03:21:34 UTC