- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:16:30 +0100
- To: Karl Groves <karl.groves@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Hi Karl, Le 18 févr. 2008 à 15:45, Karl Groves a écrit : > I was wondering if there was an established protocol for submitting > reviews of the HTML5 recommendation? Should they be posted to this > address? Should it be within the body of the e-mail or as an > attachment? If as an attachment, what file formats are preferred? In the Status of the document, right now it is said: If you wish to make comments regarding this document, please send them to public-html-comments@w3.org (subscribe, archives). All feedback is welcome. -- HTML 5 http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:44:13 GMT Each person have their own habits. But I would recommend each time you make a comment 1. to create a separate mail for each technical issue with an appropriate topic on the Subject line 2. give the link to the appropriate section with the reference with the dated uri of the spec. Ex: table caption element http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-20080122/#the-caption 3. To talk about the issue in clear terms 4. To submit test cases with your issue if you want to illustrate an implementation flaw (group all typos, grammar, etc. in one email) Some personal recommendations * Be patient for the answer it might take a long while. * Keep a record of the issues URIs you sent to the list Ex: Protocol for submitting reviews of HTML5 recommendation? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Feb/0289 * Try always to be constructive, aka propose something more than pointing out a flaw. * Be aware they are people with many different cultures, goals, and background on this list. And it might require time to understand and explain things. Hope it helps. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Monday, 18 February 2008 16:16:38 UTC