- From: gonchuki <gonchuki@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:23:07 -0200
- To: "Chasen Le Hara" <rendezvouscp@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Feb 7, 2008 4:05 PM, Chasen Le Hara <rendezvouscp@gmail.com> wrote: > believe that the overall benefit of marking up the > referenced bug with the strike element *might* be worth the cost of keeping > it in the spec *if* we can find other use cases for the strike element. It > would be great if we could find semantics for the strike element, but I > don't see that happening. You won't find it as <strike> is a presentational element. Stroked doesn't mean resolved, or invalid, or whatever. It just means stroked and that's just visual perception. Remember that semantics go beyond what the user perceives visually, it's about giving concrete and concise meaning to the marked up text.
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 18:23:19 UTC