- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:46:13 +0000
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- CC: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli wrote: > I too am satisfied with just one strike element. I think I would prefer > STRIKE, though, because I don't mind that it is «difficult/longer» to > type the strike element. It should not be used often, and it should be > evident what it means. (Since it is more seldom used, one will not > remember it so easily if one only see a letter S.) However, I am also > fine with the S element, for the reason you mention. It's not clear to me what benefits there are from <strike> v. (say) <span class="struck-through">, but given a choice between <strike> and <s> I would much prefer the former, since <s> could only too easily be confused with <strong> by analogy with <b>. Philip TAYLOR
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 16:46:42 UTC