- From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <list@asbjorn.ulsberg.no>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:49:20 +0100
- To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:49:19 +0100, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > Yes, either here on public-html or on public-html-comments. I've now read through large parts of the guide and have various comments ranging from complete paragraph rewrites to small typos, etc. I'd be most comfortable providing these comments through a diff of some sort, an SVN check-in, or something similar, instead of quoting and explaining a lot about each comment through e-mail. What method for improvements like this would you prefer? >> And what will be the relationship between the HTML5 specification and >> the authoring guide? > > I'm not sure I understand the question. Could you please elaborate? There's obviously a one-way relationship from the authoring guide to the HTML5 specification, but as I mention in the following paragraph, I'd like the relationship to be two-ways. > Once it gets published as an FPWD, then informatively referencing the > guide from the spec is possible, if there is somewhere in the spec from > where such a reference would be appropriate. I think having such a reference from the HTML5 specification is vital to the authoring guide's overall usefulness, discoverability and authority. -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbjorn@ulsberg.no «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2008 15:50:03 UTC