- From: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:47:58 -0500
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Mikko Rantalainen" <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>, "Tina Holmboe" <tina@greytower.net>, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>, "Leif Halvard Silli" <lhs@malform.no>, www-html@w3.org, "HTML WG Public List" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Mikko Rantalainen wrote: >> I'm still wondering if HTML5 should define an element for less than >> normal importance or emphasis. >> > On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Jonathan Worent wrote: >> If I have a sentence where the less important part is in the middle of >> the sentence but the whole sentence is important, I would want to mark >> up the whole sentence as a single element. Agreed, but if the importance is decreased in the middle, than I think the (greatest) importance probably attaches to separate spans smaller than the full sentence. [In response to requests for an example] >> > On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Mikko Rantalainen wrote: >> >> Example: >> >> <p>One should <em>never execute <code>rm -rf /</code> >> >> in a UNIX shell <dem>because doing so would remove >> >> everything in the system</dem></em>.</p> >> > >> > Why not: >> > >> > <p>One should <strong>never execute <code>rm -rf /</code> in a UNIX >> > shell</strong> (because doing so would remove everything in the >> > system).</p> >> For plain text case I agree that using the parenthesis is enough. >> However, if the content is something else but just plain text (an >> <object> for example) an element is required to mark up the semantics. > This seems highly theoretical. Do you have a "real world" example in the > wild showing this? (Ideally not something written by one of us.) I would go farther and say that if you do want to decrease emphasis, and parentheses are not sufficient, then you probably want to mark the de-emphasized part in some other way as well. The most likely ways seem to be as <details>, as an <aside>, or whatever the convention for <footnote> ends up being. -jJ
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2008 22:48:39 UTC