- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:37:37 +0200
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org
Steven Faulkner wrote: > Two images without explicitly associated text alternatives. > 1 is an image is decorative that the author has accidently left off > the alt, the other is "critical content" that the author could not > provide an alt for whatever reason > 1 can be safely ignored, the other should be brought to the attention > of the user. > > <img src="abc.jpg"> > > <img src="xyz.jpg"> > > How is Assistive Technology supposed to reliably determine this? I'm not sure what your point is here. The same question can be applied when both have empty alt attributes: <img src="abc.jpg" alt=""> <img src="xyz.jpg" alt=""> -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 13:38:35 UTC