- From: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:16:07 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > A common theme across some of the problems listed above, and discussed in > detail in the e-mails below, is the issue of a generic syntax for non-HTML > namespaces in text/html. It turns out to be _exceedingly_ hard to handle > the giant mass of weirdness found in legacy content on the Web while > adding new features. For example, this page: > > http://www.laroseweb.com/calcs/fans.php > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > > <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> > <math xmlns="&mathml;"> > > <head> > [... continues with just a normal XHTML page] ...renders exactly the same in Firefox 2 and IE8b1 (don't know why, probably because they come before <head>) > ...or this page: > > http://www.cocopahrv.com/map.html > > [...] > <table width="592" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> > <tr align="left" valign="top"> > <td width="592"><svg width="200" height="200" viewBox="0 0 > 200 200"><img name="r1_c1" src="map/resortmap.jpg" width="600" > height="465" border="0" alt="Cocopah RV and Golf Resort" > usemap="#r1_c1Map"><map name="r1_c1Map"><area shape="rect" > coords="4,2,298,230" href="map/lmp1a.jpg"><area shape="rect" > coords="1,230,296,460" href="map/lmp1b.jpg"><area shape="rect" > coords="297,4,598,231" href="map/lmp2a.jpg"><area shape="rect" > coords="297,231,599,462" href="map/lmp2b.jpg"></map><rect > x="100" y="100" width="10" height="20" style="fill: green"/> > </svg> </td> > </tr> > </table> > [...] Don't use xmlns="" so renders exactly the same in Firefox 2 and IE8b1 (I've nly tested those two; not that I couldn't have tested more, but I thought it was sufficient). > http://kr.blog.yahoo.com/yunneo2000/1111673 > http://puysl.com/view.htm > http://albren.blogspot.com/2007/02/l05-traductor.html > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > Instead of "starts with x_", how about "contains a colon"? > > I considered that, but unfortunately, it forms a dichotomy of semantics, > where when used in XML the DOM shows one set of names, and when used in > text/html, it shows another (at least in legacy UAs, though we could > hard-code behaviour for new UAs). IE already does this (report the thing following the first colon) since version 5.5 (if there's a corresponding xmlns:<prefix> attribute on the <html> element or a <?XML:NAMESPACE prefix=<prefix> /> pseudo-processing-instruction) If we follow the same rules (except for the <?XML:NAMESPACE />), we probably won't break much pages... > On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > > Establishing a pseudo-XML parsing scope for <svg> and math. > > > > IE8's approach seems to be "establish a pseudo-XML parsing scope for > > unknown elements which contain an attribute named xmlns that happens to > > match a list of known values", where the list of known values may vary > > by user agent or installation. IMHO, that approach merits exploration. > > Unfortunately, exploration basically shows that IE8 doesn't do anything > (at least, I couldn't reproduce it) with xmlns="", other than screw up the > attribute parsing), It processes "/>" and puts the elements in a different "scope" (cf. scopeName and tagUrn). > and a quick study of existing documents suggests that > there's a great deal of content that wouldn't be handled very well at all > by anything triggering off xmlns="", You might well be correct (Sam's blog fails to render in IE8b1, but it seems to be a bug in their parser, probably because of the screwed-up attribute parsing), though aside from those parser-bugs I guess Microsoft has done some testing on their own... Maybe someone from Microsoft could comment on this? Chris? > even if it were limited to unknown elements or known namespaces > (e.g. see the examples at the top of this e-mail). They're all rendered "correctly" (i.e. the same as in Firefox) in IE8b1. Actually, the only problem I see with IE8's "enhanced namespace support" is the lack of namespace support for attributes. And fortunately, supporting namespaced elements (à la IE8 or IE5.5/6/7) is not incompatible with your effort for supporting SVG and MathML "out-of-the-box" (great job by the way). My 2 c€nts... -- Thomas Broyer
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 14:16:49 UTC