- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:37:17 -0700
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
I meant that we should make it explicit that multiple arguments are allowed and the extra ones are ignored in this version. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch] > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 2:29 PM > To: David Orchard > Cc: Anne van Kesteren; HTML WG > Subject: RE: HTMLDocument interface for write() and writeln() > needs an update > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, David Orchard wrote: > > > > I would suggest allowing but ignoring the extra arguments. If some > > future version wants to support multiple arguments they can > then they > > have the option of creating something that is compatible. > > I'm confused. We can't ignore multiple arguments, that's the > whole point. > The issue is just about whether we should legitimise it from > an author point of view. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E > )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ > _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. > `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' >
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 21:38:08 UTC