- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:08:22 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 14:18 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: >> Dan Connolly wrote: > [...] >>> I followed up with W3C management/legal and they're OK with: >>> >>> (a) using the W3C software license for collaboration between >>> the HTML WG and the html5lib project >> This would require moving the project off of the code.google.com >> infrastructure. More details: http://tinyurl.com/3agnot > > I read that message from Daniel Berlin, and it doesn't seem as strong as > your "require" suggests. Perhaps you might find one of these to be a bit stronger: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Burnette/?p=192 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Code#Project_Hosting http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting/msg/8a51e6c2f73ff932 http://www.linux.com/articles/56034 By the way, I know Greg Stein pretty well. Google's stance on this is *very* firm. > But OK, I'll see about using the MIT license for part (a). Cool. >>> (b) at some milestone, publishing a snapshot of the test suite >>> wrapped in a W3C technical report under the W3C document license. >>> >>> James, Anne, and company, does that seems OK to you? >>> >>> If switching from the MIT license to the W3C software license >>> is a big hassle, I'm perhaps flexible on that. >>> >>> Chris W., does this seem OK with you? Based on your earlier >>> feedback, I'm sorta presuming it is. - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 19:09:02 UTC