- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:58:40 -0500
- To: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
The html5lib project has one of the better chunks of HTML test materials around. I'd like to contribute to it and use it in this Working Group, so I started looking into the licensing issues. http://code.google.com/p/html5lib/ http://esw.w3.org/topic/HtmlTestMaterials html5lib uses the MIT license, which is open source and non-viral. http://html5lib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/LICENSE W3C has a relevant policy... Policies for Contribution of Test Cases to W3C http://www.w3.org/2004/10/27-testcases.html ... which involves using the W3C document license, which doesn't license derivative works; i.e. it's clearly not an open source license. Karl noted a that the DOM test suite uses the W3C software license, which, like the MIT license, is an open source, non-viral license. http://www.w3.org/DOM/Test/Documents/DOMTSFAQ I followed up with W3C management/legal and they're OK with: (a) using the W3C software license for collaboration between the HTML WG and the html5lib project (b) at some milestone, publishing a snapshot of the test suite wrapped in a W3C technical report under the W3C document license. James, Anne, and company, does that seems OK to you? If switching from the MIT license to the W3C software license is a big hassle, I'm perhaps flexible on that. Chris W., does this seem OK with you? Based on your earlier feedback, I'm sorta presuming it is. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 17:57:39 UTC