- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:06:19 +0200
- To: "Richard Schwerdtfeger" <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
(trimmed cc list) On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:36:37 +0200, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Thanks. The tricky thing is that XHTML 1.x modularization also uses the > same http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml namespace. So, when we introuce aria- > properties for xhtml serialization they also show up there. So, there is > serialization for html and then the xhtml modularization work . How is > that coordinated? Seems like an issue for W3C management to solve. (Personally I've always wondered why the HTML WG did not automatically inherit all documents that dealt with the XHTML namespace, but so be it.) This issue was raised before when it became evident that the XHTML2 WG might be using the XHTML namespace for XHTML 2.0, but no decision has been made as far as I can tell. As far as most browser vendors are concerned this is all highly theoretical though last time I checked as none of them has any intentions of implementing XHTML 2.0. (I think the XHTML Modularization is not for implementors, but for specification writers, although this is not entirely clear to me. Another thing is that it builds on top of HTML 4.01, which is being revised by the HTML WG.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 1 October 2007 20:06:39 UTC