- From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:42:00 -0400
- To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-html@w3.org>
> Sssh... don't say that too loudly; saying it makes it > more likely to come true. ;-) :-) > Yes, I expect we'll eventually want named-and-numbered > issues. But I like to start low-tech and add mechanisms > as the need arises. I can definitely appreciate that. But personally, I'm feeling that the need has arisen. There are were over 50 message on this list just today (a Sunday in the US). I really want to be involved with this, but I can't do justice to this many messages and I doubt anyone else who is not doing this full time can either. If you can give us some tools that will allow us to reduce the number of messages that we end up reading only to find out that we didn't need to read them > Have you seen the Agenda and Issues list I started? > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16 Yes, but I see a numbered list of paragraphs, not something I can scan quickly. If it were a static doc it would be one thing, but it is a living document that needs to be constantly changed, and we need a way to stay current without having to read the whole thing repeatedly. -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org http://atlanta-web.org - http://t.oolicio.us
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 03:42:09 UTC