On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 18:41 -0400, Mike Schinkel wrote: [...] > My guess is that this working group is going to be the mother of all working > groups, i.e. that almost everyone involved in web technology specifications > will (want to) be involved. That means this list is going to see an > overwhelming amount of traffic unlike probably any other list in the past, > or at least in recent memory. Sssh... don't say that too loudly; saying it makes it more likely to come true. ;-) [...] > I suggest that the chair or someone > else be appointed to identify and manage a list of issues. This would allos > discussions on identified issues would need to have those issue name/numbers > in the subject, something like i.e. "DocType01" and all list users would > co-manage the list to ensure that any conversations be identified by a > specific issue or start with (something like) "ProposedIssue00:" Have you seen the Agenda and Issues list I started? http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16 Yes, I expect we'll eventually want named-and-numbered issues. But I like to start low-tech and add mechanisms as the need arises. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Monday, 26 March 2007 03:10:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 26 March 2007 03:10:21 GMT