- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:14:38 +0100
- To: public-html-xml@w3.org
Received on Monday, 14 February 2011 08:15:11 UTC
Is really XBL not a concern of this task force ? I think that now that Decentralized Extensibility is dead, XBL is an important way of light (I mean the version where X meant XML, not the strange last version) Mohamed On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > > The vocabulary that's next up for getting native support is XBL2. I agree > with Hixie that should go into the HTML Namespace even though I disapprove > the way Hixie made the change (and other changes announced at the same time) > without consulting with relevant stake holders. > > Agreed, but that's not a concern for this TF. -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 14 February 2011 08:15:11 UTC