public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org from June 2008 by author

Dan Connolly

• RE: drastic reduction of HTML WG issue tracker contributors: explanation please? (Monday, 16 June)
• Re: discretion in adding issues [was: respecification of document.write...] (Friday, 13 June)
• Re: discretion & the issue tracker (was Re: discretion in adding issues) (Friday, 13 June)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• drastic reduction of HTML WG issue tracker contributors: explanation please? (Monday, 16 June)
• Re: discretion & the issue tracker (was Re: discretion in adding issues) (Wednesday, 4 June)
• discretion & the issue tracker (was Re: discretion in adding issues) (Wednesday, 4 June)

Julian Reschke

• Re: discretion & the issue tracker (was Re: discretion in adding issues) (Wednesday, 4 June)

Justin James

• RE: drastic reduction of HTML WG issue tracker contributors: explanation please? (Monday, 16 June)

Karl Dubost

• Re: drastic reduction of HTML WG issue tracker contributors: explanation please? (Monday, 16 June)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Re: Tracker states: RAISED, OPEN, CLOSED (Friday, 6 June)
• Re: discretion in adding issues [was: respecification of document.write...] (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: discretion in adding issues [was: respecification of document.write...] (Wednesday, 4 June)
• Re: discretion in adding issues [was: respecification of document.write...] (Wednesday, 4 June)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: heads-up about "new" URLs section in HTML5 editor's draft (Monday, 30 June)

Shawn Medero

• Tracker states: RAISED, OPEN, CLOSED (Friday, 6 June)

Steven Faulkner

• Re: drastic reduction of HTML WG issue tracker contributors: explanation please? (Monday, 16 June)

Last message date: Monday, 30 June 2008 04:30:09 UTC