W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org > June 2008

Re: discretion in adding issues [was: respecification of document.write...]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:03:15 -0500
To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Cc: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, Shawn Medero <soypunk@gmail.com>, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <1213380195.2257.14.camel@pav.lan>

On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 14:21 +0900, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
> Regardless, to get back to the point that needs to be made here:
> The raising of that group of issues represents, absolutely, a
> misuse of the tracker, and the only thing that we need to spend
> any further time on is considering which (if any) of them should
> actually be taken up as open issues for the group.

I looked them over, in collaboration with Mike and Shawn.

There's some useful substance to this one:

ISSUE-48 -- 'marks' content markup attribute for Q (quotation)

I'm not sure about 43.

For the others, (42 to 50) we marked them closed,
product none, with a pointer to this thread.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 13 June 2008 18:03:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:50:17 UTC