- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:41:29 +0800
- To: public-html-wg-announce@w3.org
My regrets, I am at a joint mpeg/jpeg meeting this week. On Oct 29, 2009, at 0:05 , Sam Ruby wrote: > The HTML Working Group will have its usual weekly teleconference on > 2009-10-17 for 60 minutes from 16:00Z to 17:00Z. > > http://timeanddate.com/s/1etz > > *** note changes in time for Amsterdam and London *** > > Tokyo 01:00+1, Amsterdam/Oslo 17:00, London/Dublin 16:00, New > Jersey/York 12 noon, Kansas City 11:00, Seattle/San Francisco 09:00. > > Chair of the meeting: Sam Ruby > Scribe: TBD > > It looks like a full agenda, so if you wish to speak on a particular > topic, I will ask that you first read the details below the summary > for the items of interest to you. > > (See the end of this email for dial-in and IRC info.) > > == Executive Summary == > > 0. Pick a scribe > > 1. Review of due and overdue action items: > a. ISSUE-35 (aria-processing): ACTION-138 on Steve Faulkner: > b. ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) ACTION-137 on Larry Masinter: > c. ISSUE-55 (head-profile): on Manu Sporny: > d. ISSUE-73 (predefined-voc): ACTION-123 on Sam Ruby: > e. ISSUE-74 (canvas-accessibility): ACTION-133 on Richard > Schwerdtfeger: > > 2. Review of action items pending review: > a. ACTION-127 on Paul Cotton: establish process for "official WG > response" to other WG's RFC on LC drafts > b. ACTION-155 on Maciej: Send CFC for review of decision policy > c. ACTION-156 on Sam Ruby: Send request for change proposals on > outstanding open issues > > 3. New issues this week: > a. ISSUE-85 ARIA roles added to the a element should be conforming > in HTML5 > b. ISSUE-86 HTML5 relaxes Atom requirement on atom:id stability > c. ISSUE-87 Should spec require whitespace normalization of > attribute values, particularly in title attribute? > > 4. Review of Chair Calls for Consensus/Proposals: > a. ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) - Chairs Solicit Proposals > b. ISSUE-7 (video-codecs) - Chairs Solicit Proposals > c. ISSUE 14 (aria-role) - suggest closing on 2009-11-12 > d. ISSUE-30 (longdesc) - Chairs Solicit Proposals > e. ISSUE-63 (origin-req-scope) - Chairs Solicit Proposals > f. ISSUE-74 (Microdata/RDFa) - Chairs Solicit *COUNTER* Proposals > > 5. Status of Task Forces > a. Testing Task Force > b. HTML Accessibility Task Force > > 6. Plans for TPAC/ECMA TC39 F2F meetings > a. ACTION-153 on Maciej Stachowiak: Outline unconference format > for > F2F meeting > b. ACTION-157 on Michael(tm) Smith: Request two smaller rooms (big > enough for 10-12 people) for breakout sessions > > 7. Scribe for next meeting > 8. Adjournment > > == Details == > > ISSUE-35 (aria-processing): ACTION-138 on Steve Faulkner: > > This action was opened on August 22, originally due 2009-08-31, then > 2009-09-10, then 2009-09-24, then 2009-10-08. We need a realistic > due date. > > --- > > ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) ACTION-137 on Larry Masinter: > > This action was opened on August 21, originally due 2009-08-31, then > 2009-09-01, then 2009-09-08, then 2009-09-17, then 2009-09-24, then > 2009-09-28, then 2009-10-21. We need a realistic due date. > > The F2F is likely to be a target rich environment for participants > who would be interested in discussing this topic. > > --- > > ISSUE-55 (head-profile): on Manu Sporny: > > We had a first draft on 27 Sept, and discussion continued to 14 Oct > and then ceased. Any new status? > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Sep/1123.html > http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/html5-epb.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/subject.html#msg414 > > --- > > ISSUE-73 (predefined-voc): ACTION-123 on Sam Ruby: > > Given that the predefined vocabularies have moved out of the spec, I > no longer see my action as relevant. Given that the originator has > indicated that this satisfies his concern, I suggest that the issue > itself be closed: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0114.html > > --- > > ISSUE-74 (canvas-accessibility): ACTION-133 on Richard Schwerdtfeger: > > This is not due this week, in fact, it is due 17 Dec. Even so, any > possibility we can we have an update? > > Related: we have a draft Canvas spec, along with informal rationale > by Doug Sheppers and Maciej, with support by Microsoft, and a draft: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0747.html > > It is unclear how the draft relates to Maciej's statement, and, in > fact, what the rationale is. How should we track this? Should we > start with a bug or an issue? How about a change proposal? > > --- > > ACTION-127 on Paul Cotton: establish process for "official WG > response" to other WG's RFC on LC drafts > > Status update? > > --- > > ACTION-155 on Maciej: Send CFC for review of decision policy > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/1034.html > > --- > > ACTION-156 on Sam Ruby: Send request for change proposals on > outstanding open issues > > First batch sent out on Monday. Individual issues discussed below. > > --- > > ISSUE-85 ARIA roles added to the a element should be conformingin > HTML5 > > New issue. Any volunteers to write a change proposal? > > --- > > ISSUE-86 HTML5 relaxes Atom requirement on atom:id stability > > New issue. Any volunteers to write a change proposal? > > --- > > ISSUE-87 Should spec require whitespace normalization of attribute > values, particularly in title attribute? > > New issue. Any volunteers to write a change proposal? > > --- > > ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) - Chairs Solicit Proposals > > No response yet. > > --- > > ISSUE-7 (video-codecs) - Chairs Solicit Proposals > > No response yet > > --- > > ISSUE 14 (aria-role) - suggest closing on 2009-11-12 > > No response yet. > > --- > > ISSUE-30 (longdesc) - Chairs Solicit Proposals > > Change Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0949.html > > Does this proposal need to be revised based on feedback? > > Is it time to call for counter-proposals? > > --- > > ISSUE-63 (origin-req-scope) - Chairs Solicit Proposals > > No response yet. > > --- > > ISSUE-74 (Microdata/RDFa) - Chairs Solicit *COUNTER* Proposals > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0773.html > > The request for rationale for keeping Microdata in the spec appears > to have gotten some mild pushback. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0955.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0957.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0971.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0981.html > > --- > > Status of Task Forces > a. Testing Task Force > b. HTML Accessibility Task Force > > Current status is that both are started, with the HATF lacking an > HTMLWG liaison. The chairs are still discussing how to proceed with > this issue. > > Any other actions the chairs need to focus on? > > Any (early) status either TF wishes to report on? > > --- > > Plans for HTML WG F2F meeting, Nov 5-6 > > ACTION-153 on Maciej Stachowiak: Outline unconference format for F2F > meeting > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/1032.html > > ACTION-157 on Michael(tm) Smith: Request two smaller rooms (big > enough for 10-12 people) for breakout sessions > > Status update? > > == Dial-in and IRC Details == > > Zakim teleconference bridge > +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99, +44.117.370.6152 > code: HTML (4865) > > Supplementary IRC chat (logged) > #html-wg on irc.w3.org port 6665 or port 80 > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standard, Apple Inc.
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 06:42:05 UTC