- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:16:04 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- CC: public-html-testsuite@w3.org
On 11/24/2010 05:42 PM, David Carlisle wrote: > On 18/11/2010 10:39, James Graham wrote: >> On 11/18/2010 02:08 AM, David Carlisle wrote: >> >>> http://monet.nag.co.uk/~dpc/html5test/submission/DavidCarlisle/math-parse01.html >>> >>> >> >> I have reviewed these and consider them fine. >> > > Thanks, > > With some help from Philippe, I have obtained write access to the > mercurial repository and checked in the above (modulo a spelling > correction in a message) as > > http://test.w3.org/html/tests/submission/DavidCarlisle/math-parse01.html > > Is it possible for this to be moved to "approved"? > > There is an existing approved/foreigncontent directory, so it could go > in there, although that currently just tests svg, so it might be better > to rename that to > foreigncontent-svg > and have a new > foreigncontent-math ? > As a general, point, do we have some way to tell who owns each test in approved/ ? I guess I agreed to the current scheme at some point in the past, but now I see it, I think it is flawed. We should either a) retain the structure from submitted/ so that it is at least obvious on a per-organisation level who owns which test from the directory name, or b) add metadata to indicate the owner of each test (see my previous proposal about per-directory JSON), or c) both.
Received on Thursday, 25 November 2010 09:16:42 UTC