On 20/04/10 17:48, James Graham wrote: > Here is some initial thinking (not, I am not saying that the current > harness does poorly at all these things, I am just trying to produce a > reasonably complete set of good features as a starting point for further > discussion) The one thing I think that is really missing from that list is a sensible way to tie in to regression tracking systems, so it seems a reasonable requirement to be able to send results back somehow, using extra code on top of the test harness without having to hideously hack the harness. -- Geoffrey Sneddon — Opera Software <http://gsnedders.com/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:02:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:49:35 UTC