- From: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 10:59:09 -0400
- To: Zak Rogoff <zak@fsf.org>, public-html-media@w3.org
On 7/6/2017 10:53 AM, Zak Rogoff wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the update. > > You mention that formal publication of Encrypted Media Extensions will > happen at a later date, and the version of EME which I understand to be > canonical still says that it is a Proposed Recommendation: > https://www.w3.org/TR/encrypted-media/ > > A few questions: > > Are there any more decision-making steps which EME still must go through > to reach Recommendation? No. At this stage, the Director issued a decision. > If not, why is formal publication delayed? This is required by our Process: [[ If there was any dissent in Advisory Committee reviews, the Director must publish the substantive content of the dissent to W3C and the general public, and must formally address the comment at least 14 days before publication as a W3C Recommendation. ]] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#rec-publication > Also, is it still possible for the AC to appeal it? Our Process also indicates: [[ Advisory Committee representatives may initiate an Advisory Committee Appeal of the W3C decision ]] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#rec-publication This then points to section 7.2 Appeal by Advisory Committee Representatives: https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#ACAppeal Philippe
Received on Thursday, 6 July 2017 14:59:17 UTC