- From: Joe Feely <joe.feely@googlemail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 19:45:23 +0100
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: Xabier Rodríguez Calvar <calvaris@igalia.com>, "<public-html-media@w3.org>" <public-html-media@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM6KL039B1kuRNUj9u0pbRt=i0S6wghC1q2pHsg+QQzku7=tEw@mail.gmail.com>
It appears to me (hope I'm not missing the point here) that the fact that this matter is being discussed by you guys, and is not by any means clear-cut, and you guys are smart, then it would seem a near or actual certainty that those who wish to apply the DMCA in a far from caring way will find opportunity to do so. This is one of the issues with this whole project that greatly concerns me. Joe On 5 August 2016 at 17:11, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 5, 2016, at 2:49 , Xabier Rodríguez Calvar <calvaris@igalia.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > O Xov, 04-08-2016 ás 11:08 -0700, David Singer escribiu: > >> > >> True, having watched people argue that gorillas are (or are not) > >> natural persons, nothing surprises. > > > > I think this comment is out of place. I don't have the intention to > > bikeshed here but we should refrain such comparisons with other > > people's believes. You don't know who's subscribed to this list and who > > you could be offending. > > I’m sorry if I caused offense, because none was intended. > > My point is that if we claim in the spec. that neither the implementations > of EME nor the underlying DRMs are technical protection measures, I think > that greatly weakens the argument about EME: those who believe that a DRM > is a technical protection measure will reject the statement as false, and > at best this calls into question whether EME is, in fact, ‘part of’ a TPM. > I would be concerned that such a statement would, in fact, be worse than > saying nothing. If people believe it’s wrong about the underlying DRM, then > maybe it’s also wrong about EME. > > Let’s try another analogy: “neither the sky nor the glass are blue”. I > don’t agree with the statement about the sky, and I observe that there are > grasses called ‘bluegrass’ so maybe the entire statement is false, not just > false in part. At this point, asking someone “what color is grass” they > might reply “well, I don’t know, sometimes it might be blue” when > previously one would have probably got the reply “um, grass is green”. > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > > >
Received on Friday, 5 August 2016 18:45:54 UTC