Re: [EME] Event handler and message cluster (ISSUE-19, ISSUE-14 and ISSUE-31)

I believe the next steps are for me to translate information on low-level
dispatching rules into a description of how that affects the intended
behavior in issue #19. It doesn't make sense to implement #14 and #31 until
we're using the correct primitives.

David

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> What is the status of your work on the event handler and message cluster
> of issues:  ISSUE-19, ISSUE-14 and ISSUE-31?
>
>
>
> Note that David removed the “needs feedback” tags from ISSUE-19 and
> ISSUE-14 today.
>
>
>
> /paulc
>
>
>
> Event handler and message cluster
>
> Status: Jul 7 - Jerry agreed to provide feedback by Jul 21.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2015/07/07-html-media-minutes.html#item05
>
>
>
> a) Issue-19 Ensure promises returned by methods are fulfilled before event
> handlers are executed
>
> https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/issues/19
>
> Feedback request:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2015Jun/0035.html
>
>
>
> b) ISSUE-14 Consider changing how the MediaKeySession method algorithms
> run other algorithms to more accurately reflect implementations
>
> https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/issues/14
>
> Blocked by ISSUE-19.  ISSUE-14 also needed feedback.
>
>
>
> c) ISSUE-31 generateRequest() should allow the first message to not be a
> license request based on initData
>
> https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/issues/31
>
> Blocked by ISSUE-19.
>
>
>
>
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
>
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
>
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
>
>