- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:21:13 +0200
- To: Hans Schmucker <hansschmucker@gmail.com>
- Cc: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>, "<public-html-media@w3.org>" <public-html-media@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Hans Schmucker <hansschmucker@gmail.com> wrote: > So now, the first order of business is making sure that the EME spec does > not say anything about it, unlike what it currently does in the introduction > and 2.3. Hmm. The draft has two sections 2.3. I take it that you mean the latter one of them. Do you object only to "Where media rendering is not performed by the UA, for example in the case of a hardware protected media pipeline, then the full set of HTML rendering capabilities, for example CSS Transforms, may not be available. One likely restriction is that video media may be constrained to appear only in rectangular regions with sides parallel to the edges of the window and with normal orientation."? Or do you also object to: "Media data processed by a CDM may not be available through Javascript APIs in the usual way (for example using the CanvasRenderingContext2D drawImage() method and the AudioContext MediaElementAudioSourceNode). This specification does not define conditions for such non-availability of media data, however, if media data is not available to Javascript APIs then these APIs may behave as if no media data was present at all."? Question to the editors: Why is the last part I quoted saying "may" in the last sentence instead of "must" and why is it marked non-normative? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@hsivonen.fi https://hsivonen.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 10:21:40 UTC