- From: Dan Dart <dan@dandart.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 14:06:05 +0100
- To: public-html-media@w3.org
I'd also add that they should be able to be viewed without an Internet connection, be able to be backed up in case one's connection fails and be viewable in any media player of choice which would otherwise hinder choice on the users' part. I have no objection to a non-crippled DRM but I'm not yet convinced that one exists. Any help here would be much appreciated. Yes, since we have to know the algorithm for it to be free (and of course it will have to be) and since the keys have to be available... It's really a no go. I quote you the example of 09f9 and Steam. The most protected content is also generally the most copied. I think it's a waste of time and effort to implement DRM personally as someone will always break it, and hence render it pointless. It would be better to spend your hard earned money on improving software for the better, instead of creating a futile attempt to protect media that's just going to be broken anyway, and I wish Netflix (whose service I have not tried yet as its videos are only available through a proprietary gateway) and the BBC (of all people) would realise this. I can't see this as something that will work at all, it's just so unviable and even if it was standardised I doubt vendors such as Firefox or Epiphany (which of course videos on the web would have to support) would even implement it. Cheers Dan Web Developer and Musician for the Open Web
Received on Monday, 13 May 2013 13:47:52 UTC