Re: EME

+1, it makes totally sense. Only thing is, is it feasable? DRM is generally
based on protection by ocultation, so how it could be implemented in a way
that can be implemented on open source browsers that can run in whatever
imaginable OS? I think is impossible, and it's one of the reasons why DRM
in HTML5 specification doesn't make sense.
El 13/05/2013 07:07, "B. Ross Ashley" <brashley46@tfnet.ca> escribió:

>  On 13-05-13 12:51 AM, Brendan Aragorn wrote:
>
>  Having noticed concerns from the free software community, it seems
> mandatory to an open web that the API must mandate that all CDMs be
> unconditionally cross-platform.  By this I mean that in order to ensure
> that those who chose to use the "premium content providers" products must
> be able to on any Operating system with aworking HTML5 Browser.  In simpler
> terms the CDMs must be mandated as OS/Browser independent.  This allows the
> CDMs to be proprietary, while forceing any group using them to offer their
> content to all internet users, as is already mandated by current W3C
> standards.  The APIs will be written so that no platform specific CDM will
> function.
>
>  Brendan Aragorn
>
> Agree to that. This would resolve any objections I have personally.
>
> --
> B. Ross Ashley
> registered Linux user 548111
>
>