W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > February 2013

Re: {minutes} HTML WG media telecon 2013-02-26 - EME bugs discussion

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:43:26 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2mX4oBXJ5Z2a2+ubgtNj45AEWb0G=TyT4axiWxvgiKF4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: robert@ocallahan.org
Cc: Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com>, "<public-html-media@w3.org>" <public-html-media@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer <
> silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> After the intensive discussions in the WG, I would have liked to see more
>> actions distributed to task force members, more analysis being done on DRMs
>> (even if they are out of score for this effort - they still need to be
>> understood be the WG to make an informed decision), more discussions
>> started with opponents like Henri and Robert.
>
>
> For what it's worth I don't see myself as an "opponent" of EME (beyond the
> "I wish we didn't have to do this" position also professed by undoubted EME
> proponents). I've made constructive suggestions that could resolve my
> objection and allow EME to go forward with minimal or no changes to actual
> EME implementations.
>

Apologies. Poor choice of words. I absolutely meant to say that it was a
constructive discussion and I wanted it to continue.

Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2013 05:44:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:48:32 UTC