On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer < > silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> After the intensive discussions in the WG, I would have liked to see more >> actions distributed to task force members, more analysis being done on DRMs >> (even if they are out of score for this effort - they still need to be >> understood be the WG to make an informed decision), more discussions >> started with opponents like Henri and Robert. > > > For what it's worth I don't see myself as an "opponent" of EME (beyond the > "I wish we didn't have to do this" position also professed by undoubted EME > proponents). I've made constructive suggestions that could resolve my > objection and allow EME to go forward with minimal or no changes to actual > EME implementations. > Apologies. Poor choice of words. I absolutely meant to say that it was a constructive discussion and I wanted it to continue. Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2013 05:44:14 UTC