W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > February 2013

Re: {minutes} HTML WG media telecon 2013-02-26 - EME bugs discussion

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:43:18 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLY5jqnM2reCDV6Ztxt6fr_PTK33GpNLasXfEBnU2jKhqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com>, "<public-html-media@w3.org>" <public-html-media@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com
> wrote:

> After the intensive discussions in the WG, I would have liked to see more
> actions distributed to task force members, more analysis being done on DRMs
> (even if they are out of score for this effort - they still need to be
> understood be the WG to make an informed decision), more discussions
> started with opponents like Henri and Robert.

For what it's worth I don't see myself as an "opponent" of EME (beyond the
"I wish we didn't have to do this" position also professed by undoubted EME
proponents). I've made constructive suggestions that could resolve my
objection and allow EME to go forward with minimal or no changes to actual
EME implementations.

Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur
Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl
bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat
lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir
— whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb
tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 20:43:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:48:32 UTC