W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > August 2013

Re: {minutes} HTML WG media telecon 2013-08-06 - EME status and bug discussion

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:41:42 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLaeuUeaabRB1KTFNLb=Oy6szr9N07QVQr4G+RGh-6v6OA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "<public-html-media@w3.org>" <public-html-media@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> I would be interested to know how a W3C specification could require an
> implementer of an implementation detail of EME (i.e., a CDM) to register it,

We had this discussion before.
The IETF does it. So can the W3C.

or to put it another way, how could the W3C enforce such a requirement even
> if it were written into the spec?

The W3C can't enforce anything in any spec. Neither can the IETF for that
matter. Specs still have value.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2013 02:42:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:48:40 UTC