W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > August 2013

Re: {minutes} HTML WG media telecon 2013-08-06 - EME status and bug discussion

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:41:42 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLaeuUeaabRB1KTFNLb=Oy6szr9N07QVQr4G+RGh-6v6OA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "<public-html-media@w3.org>" <public-html-media@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> I would be interested to know how a W3C specification could require an
> implementer of an implementation detail of EME (i.e., a CDM) to register it,
>

We had this discussion before.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Jan/0233.html
The IETF does it. So can the W3C.

or to put it another way, how could the W3C enforce such a requirement even
> if it were written into the spec?
>

The W3C can't enforce anything in any spec. Neither can the IETF for that
matter. Specs still have value.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2013 02:42:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:48:40 UTC