On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>wrote: > glenn: there were a couple of comments since the last meeting > ... i proposed a way to resolve this bug > ... Robert O'Callahan responded that it wasn't as strong as he > desired > ... i responded that he'd have to convince the group of his > proposal > ... he's requesting a fairly strong set of information about > CDM > ... i'm recommending a voluntary registry in the wiki > > adrianba: i'd be okay with the wiki proposal > > glenn: does anyone support robert's proposal? > ... does anyone think we should keep it open for longer? > So far as I can tell, the only rationale being presented for rejecting my proposal is "no-one in the telecon supports it", which is vacuous. Surely there should be some actual rationale that addresses the proposal on its merits? Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 23:04:23 UTC