- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:20:57 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>
On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:44 , Dan Brickley wrote: [snip] > > It certainly wouldn't hurt to have a more carefully documented use > case for multiple-types. But perhaps it's better to to leave Microdata > as Microdata rather than try to mutate it into RDFa Lite, since we > already have one of those. Getting the RDF view of Microdata right > seems more important to me than making Microdata fully RDFish. > +1 Ivan > Dan > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/Mixing_HTML_Data_Formats#Mixing_Vocabularies_in_microdata >> [2] http://www.w3.org/wiki/Choosing_an_HTML_Data_Format#Syntax_Considerations >> -- >> Jeni Tennison >> http://www.jenitennison.com >> >> ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 12:18:29 UTC