- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:23:38 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>
On Nov 14, 2011, at 12:18 , Dan Brickley wrote: [snip] > > ...from an RDF perspective this isn't very joined up data yet; but it > does show a natural scoping limit to Schema.org. We can't copy and > paste all such schemes into one big Schema. What we can do is > encourage those controlled vocabularies to publish (in SKOS/RDFa > rather than PDF or Excel?) and document e.g. how '15-1132.00 Software > Developers' as a string relates to entries in that dataset, and/or how > they could be cited by URL instead. If Schema.org can grow towards > such a documentation centre role, i.e. as a hub for publishers and > consumers of this data, then it might be a natural step towards also > documenting medium and small-sized vocabularies too. As ever, that > doesn't mean all search engines will support everything. So I think > we'll start with the large controlled vocabs > (wikipedia/freebase/dbpedia/wikidata, SKOS) while also collecting > mappings to the other widely used RDF vocabs. If RDFa parsers did > something useful with such mappings, that might help move things along > too... > I am not sure what you mean. What would you think an RDFa parser may do? Ivan > cheers, > > Dan > > > (*) is that a pecularly Britis English-ish formulation? :) > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 12:21:02 UTC