- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:29:34 +0000
- To: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:13:03 +0100 Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > In OWL, the only way to express this constraint is to use a > datatype-property: using an object property would allow any resource > (including bnodes) as value. Just use an object property, and accept the fact that OWL isn't capable of expressing every possible constraint. <http://tobyinkster.co.uk/#i> foaf:homepage [] . # deal with it! ;-) Setting a property's rdfs:range to owl:NamedIndividual is at least an *indication* that you intend a property not to be used with bnode values. Whatsmore, it will allow DL tools to whine about it. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 13:28:46 UTC