- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:12:32 +0100
- To: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
- CC: public-html-comments@w3.org
Gannon Dick wrote: > I, myself, am not fond of that syntax. > > 1. There is the RDFa "about" attribute for that sort of use. noted, but on form submit that gets lost surely, of primary concern is to be able to use (and submit) typed names and values - this would be a huge time saver in a linked-data rdfa world and also allow for lots of nice functionality on the client side (form auto-completion etc). regardless of fondness of syntax, is it valid? aside: perhaps for off-list discussion, are there other approaches? Regards, Nathan > 2. For modeling, that could mean name = skos:Concept, which is a bit too much like the Jeopardy Game Show and less like meta data processing I think. > > --Gannon > > --- On Fri, 4/30/10, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > >> From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> >> Subject: form name attribute values >> To: public-html-comments@w3.org >> Date: Friday, April 30, 2010, 11:24 AM >> Hi All, >> >> I've been looking through the spec for clarification on >> whether URIs can >> be used inside the name= attribute on form elements: >> >> <input type="text" name="http://ex.org/ns#name"... >> >> in addition the following syntax: >> >> name="uri[uri]" >> >> Any clarification? >> >> Best, >> >> Nathan >> >> >> > > > > >
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 17:13:13 UTC