- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:22:15 +0100
- To: "Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-html-comments@w3.org
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:42:55 +0100, Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> The text/html syntax allows you to use XHTML in as >> far XHTML 1.x as text/html allowed you to use it. > > I want missing explicit tags as clear errors, not as > optional. Case-sensitive, unforgiving, that is as it > should be from my POV (=> easier to debug). Then use XHTML5 with the proper media type. XHTML 1.x as text/html didn't have this feature either. >> no prefixes, but <br/> works > > <br/> fails miserably with Netscape 3, I think you > mean <br />. Either way, Netscape 3 is sort of irrelevant at this point. (I know you used it until the summer of 2007 :-)) >> I suppose xml:lang is the only difference > > Right, some "transitional" (~ forever) side effects > are ridiculous, fortunately xml:id wasn't around :-) > > BTW, your diff memo could mention that lang="" (or > xml:lang="") are now permitted for XML compatibility. > That wasn't the case in XHTML 1, it was forced to > stick to NMTOKEN (non-empty, as in HTML 4). Added a small note to my local copy that I should probably mention that and also IRIs. Thanks. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 28 January 2008 12:19:31 UTC