- From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:42:55 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: <public-html-comments@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > The text/html syntax allows you to use XHTML in as > far XHTML 1.x as text/html allowed you to use it. I want missing explicit tags as clear errors, not as optional. Case-sensitive, unforgiving, that is as it should be from my POV (=> easier to debug). > no prefixes, but <br/> works <br/> fails miserably with Netscape 3, I think you mean <br />. > I suppose xml:lang is the only difference Right, some "transitional" (~ forever) side effects are ridiculous, fortunately xml:id wasn't around :-) BTW, your diff memo could mention that lang="" (or xml:lang="") are now permitted for XML compatibility. That wasn't the case in XHTML 1, it was forced to stick to NMTOKEN (non-empty, as in HTML 4). Frank
Received on Monday, 28 January 2008 11:42:46 UTC