[Bug 25501] 3.2.4.1 missing discussion of 'empty' content model

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25501

--- Comment #4 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Karl Groves from comment #3)
> That's fine. My point is that the same explanation you just gave should be
> provided in 3.2.4.1 so that a reader doesn't go there looking for an
> explanation of what the 'Empty' Content Model is and find it missing.

would 'None' be any clearer:

as the definition of 'content model' says
"Content model
A normative description of what content must be included as children and
descendants of the element."
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/dom.html#element-dfn-content-model

What must be included as children is nothing in the case of void elements
right?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 1 May 2014 08:32:03 UTC