- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 04:38:56 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25526 Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> --- On second look, I see these APIs are extracted from (and already defined on) HTML{Input,TextArea}Element. And thus, the IDL is effectively redundant. Perhaps a note could be added indicating this fact, so others won't trip over the same problem. I also notice the second class in the HTML source "extract", which name is a bit odd in this context, but will suffice to filter out this fragment with an IDL harvesting tool. Given this, I'm going to mark this as WORKSFORME. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2014 04:38:58 UTC