[Bug 25501] 3.2.4.1 missing discussion of 'empty' content model

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25501

--- Comment #5 from Karl Groves <kgroves@paciellogroup.com> ---
I think Empty is fine, and probably more accurate. Empty should be understood
as being a node which has no other element nodes or text nodes.

All I'm suggesting is that this simple clarification be placed in 3.2.4.1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 1 May 2014 12:00:12 UTC